First of all, I would like to preface this by saying that I am used to gatherings and residencies within my own field, but this was my first major experience of an inter-disciplinary artistic residency. This review is personal and only reflects my own experience at that time in my life. I tried to both cover the different areas with precision, and yet to not be too specific or detail-oriented.
I am an—unscripted—theatre maker, performer and teacher, and used to be a geologist, as well as a teacher at university. I considered doing my masters degree in Longyearbyen, and had already considered applying for this residency earlier in my career but had discarded the option back then. So obviously, I was very excited to be able to apply to The Arctic Circle, especially for its natural environment, as well as the multi-field aspect—artists, scientists and educators.
The environment was absolutely stunning: Svalbard is a gorgeous place on Earth, the weather conditions were fabulous and there was something very special about having 24h of sun a day (I took part of the Summer residency). The ship we were on (Antigua, for its last year as part of the program) is a beautiful vessel, with all amenities, very comfortable and the crew was absolutely top-notch in their skills and how friendly, interesting and helpful they all were.
I've met some great artists and people on the ship, and I am still in touch with a part of my fellow-residents. A first let-down on my expectation was the absence of scientists and teachers as part of the residency. Some of us were interested in sciences, or curious about it, and some were also teachers for arts, but everyone was primarily an artist. This felt a bit off compared to how the residency, or 'expedition', was advertised by the organisation: it was probably my most touristic experience ever, and was a gorgeous opportunity to discover this part of the world surrounded by other fantastic artists, but didn't offer the multi-field approach.
The residency consists mostly of travels, hikes, landings in beautiful landscapes and degustation of the amazing food that the chef had prepared. I somehow was prompted—maybe because of the vocabulary used, maybe because of my own hopes—for something more focused on work and exchanges between the residents. Except for the presentations of our individual work, no other collective session was planned or facilitated, and as much as I like solo work as well, I started missing moderated conversations. Given the nature of the work and the environment—most people were working on the environmental impact of humanity and we were actively bunch of tourist in an endangered natural area—some conversations about that paradox could have been initiated by the organisation. As well as discussions on our place as artists, the intellectual property of our productions, or any other topic to reflect and profit from the fact that we were 29 artists isolated from the world for two weeks! On the plus side, books were put at the disposal of everyone and the resources of the Library of Longyearbyen were made available to the artists, which was a real treat. The guidance around the Svalbardian nature itself was also excellent, interesting and expertly dealt with, like for instance the relationship to planning vs. following what nature has to offer.
In terms of composition of the group and as a non-native English speaker, I felt like it was heavily dominated by anglo-saxon residents, which also showed in the culture that developed in the group and the 'established normalcy'. The reality is probably that the price-tag of such a residency is really high for people coming from non-dominent cultures, but I wished the program to have been more diverse on this aspect—as it was on other aspects. We were all paired in cabin by assumed genders, and I was very satisfied with my appointed cabin-mate. He was an absolute delight, and our energies were both different and highly compatible. I can only speak for my own pairing, but this was one of the highlights of my experience!
As the only theatre maker and generally one of the only live performance artists, I felt quite lonely in my craft. I could see how the photographers enjoyed sharing with each other, how the visual artists talk-shopped, or how digital media creators were able to be inspired by each other, but it felt very dry at times to be the only one in my craft. This isn't per se linked to the residency itself, but maybe to the selection made. I feel like collective arts practitioners are more used to collaboration—and maybe even more in my case being in the field of unscripted theatre—and therefore the threshold of what feels like 'togetherness' is maybe higher than for someone who primarily works alone in a studio. On the possibilities for work, it may sound obvious but being on a touristic tall ship does not always make it easy to find time or space to focus on work. Again, this might be a misalignment of my expectations, and I wonder if I was too different from the rest of the group to really find my space on a professional level, or even for my work to spark interest in others—residents and guides included.
The pre-travel communications with the program and their organisers was smooth, efficient, useful and very reactive. I have nothing to say about that other than I felt cared for and in good hands. Our iteration of the residency presented some challenges that were addressed and tried to be dealt with, but there could be better protocols and safeguards in place to not rely on the other residents when something goes wrong between residents. The end of the residency consisted in 2 and a half days on shore in Longyearbyen, and this was only made clear late in the planning process, so it is good information to have.
Overall, I had a good time and will keep good memories, but I wish I had known more clearly what to expect, especially for the price of the residency. I found a few interesting things in the experience—mostly on a personal level and with individuals—but didn't feel changed by it a professional level. It felt like a big financial investment for the little outcome, and as much as it was worth it for the experience alone and the quality of the service, I wish I could have chosen to apply or not knowing that. I did produce a show inspired by some of the historical stories we heard during the trip—and a plastic igloo in Longyearbyen—for which I collaborated with a few fellow-residents, using some of the sound recordings they had made. I would recommend for applicants to think of a very concrete project in direct relation with the landscape or the ship, that can be done no matter the schedule or the weather and independent from the participation of your co-residents—photography, videography, recordings or illustration are great examples I've witnessed first hand, because they are given priority for their concreteness.
As I mentioned at first, all of this is a very personal lens and experience, and I do not blame anyone in particular for the sub-optimal experience I had. I would probably not do it again in the same conditions, but would still recommend it to anyone that resonates with the content, the way the organisation works, and has a project that fits the bill. I hope this helps!
Read full review →